Before we get into
this one, yes, I admit that was a MAJOR clickbait title. But it’s true.
I was recently approached by someone, a believing member of
the LDS church, and was made aware of a statement I made in one of my posts
that was untrue. I am someone that finds immense value in being honest, in
correcting mistakes, and apologizing when I am wrong. I have to admit that I did
think about quietly making the change to the blog without announcing that I had
made a mistake, but I didn’t feel right about doing it that way.
The offending statement was from the last blog post, written
predominantly by my friend David. In the introduction to his article, I stated
that David was previously a fully believing member of the church who was as
committed and had as strong of a testimony as anyone else. I stated that it is
not fair to say that only those that were weak or never had a strong belief are
the only ones that leave the church. Now on to the mistake. I stated, “The only
requirement to end in our position [of no longer believing] is to allow
yourself to be open to all available information, a desire to know objective
truth, and a hunger to follow the rabbit hole to the very end.” This comment was
factually incorrect and I apologize for making this untrue statement.
I was reminded that there are individuals that research all
available information, that honestly desire to know truth, and have a
willingness to continue researching to the end that come to different
conclusions than I did. I have mentioned these individuals before. They have a
nuanced faith. They believe in the church but that belief looks much different
than what is taught in manuals and from the pulpit. They believe in a way that
is more in line with factual history and what makes the most sense considering
that history. Yet there are also those that conclude their search where I did
and no longer believe. As such, it’s not fair to abdicate researching the truth
claims of the church because you have heard that there are some other intelligent
people that have looked deeper and continue to believe.
As an example, I’ve mentioned Brian Hauglid in my blog in
the past. From my seventh article speaking about the incorrect translation of
the Book of Abraham I quote, “On a related note, Brian Hauglid was a well-known
Mormon apologist that has authored several books on difficult church topics. He
is a professor at Brigham Young University and a visiting fellow at the Maxwell
Institute. He also worked on the Joseph Smith papers project. He had agreed
with many of the arguments contained in the church article on the Book of
Abraham, until recently. In late 2018 he wrote the following: “For the record,
I no longer hold the views that have been quoted from my 2010 book…I have moved
on from my days as an “outrageous” apologist…I wholeheartedly agree with Dan’s
[Vogel] excellent assessment of the Abraham/Egyptian documents…I now reject a missing
Abraham manuscript…I no longer agree with Gee or Mulhestein. I find their
apologetic “scholarship” on the BoA abhorrent.”” I have recently learned that
Brian retired from BYU just this month, on July 1st of this year.
After his retirement,
he was interviewed on the Radio Free Mormon podcast. Speaking of the above comment that
described Gee's apologetics as "abhorrent," Brian says he doesn't
consider what Gee and his colleagues do as "scholarship," because he knows
they purposely omit evidence from readers in order to mislead them.
He stated that he no longer believes in the truthfulness of the church but
attends for his wife to keep the peace. Brian is an extremely intelligent man
that has seen and engaged in the intimate inner workings of those doing
scholarship for the church. Yet he no longer believes.
I have been thinking a lot about my faith journey recently.
I have thought long and hard about the role the LDS church will play in my life
in the future. I have decided that this will be the last post that I publish on
Facebook. I may or may not add articles to the blog over time, but I will
include these without mentioning them on my social media. I have already
removed the vast majority of Mormon friends and acquaintances from Facebook as
part of deciding how to move forward with life. I’m not against having friends that
are members of the church, some of my closest friends are, but I want friends
that are REAL friends rather than acquaintances out of convenience or
obligation. As far as what I want to conclude with, I’ve thought about and
started writing the remainder of this article many different ways. I have
completely or partially deleted these initial attempts several times.
I thought about including all the information contained
within the Gospel Topics Essays as well as research from Fair Mormon to define
what a nuanced faith looks like and how it differs from mainstream belief. For
anyone that is interested though, there is an amazing website and podcast
written by Rob Terry. He is a nuanced member of the church that has also spent
years researching. His website is https://www.churchistrue.com/.
There is a lot of information here but I would highly recommend his recent
podcast. I have included the link to the written transcripts of his podcast
episodes for those interested here: https://www.churchistrue.com/blog/.
As of this writing there are less than ten episodes, so it is not prohibitively
long. I will let his words speak for themselves but his view is likely what the
church will be teaching in the future. To reiterate, he is an active, invested,
believing member of the church that looked at all available information and has
made his faith work in the best way that he could.
I did think about including changes to church teachings and
doctrines that I believe are coming in the future. Just today I heard that
there will be further changes to the temple ordinances (even though Joseph
Smith himself said, “Ordinances instituted in the heavens before the foundation
of the world, in the priesthood, for the salvation of men, are not to be
altered or changed”). I also thought about including more information that is
persuasive towards my strong belief the LDS church is not the one and only true
church. Except I’m tired of these approaches.
As something different, I thought about attempting to start
discussions by asking thought provoking questions, like: “Does it matter that
God miraculously sent an angel with a sword to force Joseph Smith to take extra
wives (ostensibly against his will) while not giving clear direction about how
to practice polygamy or remaining silent when past leaders of the church were
promoting racist theories about black people? What would it mean to you if it
made more sense that there was no angel?” Another question might be, “Considering
we know that prophets in the church can make mistakes and speak from opinion, even
when speaking in their official capacity as prophet of the church, what would
it mean to you that they seem to be teaching the philosophies of men mingled
with scripture, when it is implied the church is above this?” The reason I would ask these questions would
not be to persuade anyone towards unbelief but to help members of the church
see that there are many, many ways to believe in the LDS church and that some
actually make more sense than what is taught on Sunday. Hopefully this would
expand spaces in the church for people that continue to want to be part of it
but don’t fit the mold we have previously been expected to fit. I thought about
trying to build bridges and create dialogue between mainstream believing
members of the church and those that have a nuanced faith, progressive Mormons,
or those that no longer believe. This is what I initially tried to do. Yet it
hasn’t worked to this point, so I don’t hold much faith that this would work
now. I guess there’s a reason you don’t talk about religion or politics at the
dinner table. It very rarely ends well.
I’ve learned that dialogue is not very effective when it is
one sided. I have had mostly brief interactions with people about these things
but these conversations tend to end abruptly when others don’t know how to
respond to my concerns. I have seen other people try to create dialogue, both
from within (Rob Terry) and from without (Allan Mount from the Marriage on a
Tightrope podcast for mixed faith marriages). I have seen how both of them can
be ridiculed by the other side when their views do not agree with mainstream
belief. Social media as well as social circles become echo chambers where only
those that agree with you can be tolerated due to the lack of any desire to
understand the other side. I have recently seen a meme that says it can’t
actually hurt you to have a discussion with someone that doesn’t agree with
you. Except very few people really want to hear or discuss the other side. I
get it. It’s scary. But isn’t that why we like to tell scary stories around the
campfire? Why many of us enjoy watching scary movies? Talking about scary
things can be exciting. They can open your mind to other possibilities. These
discussions don’t have to be controversial or confrontational. I actually went
for lunch yesterday to have one of these discussions and, as always, it was comfortable
and we both left feeling respected and, honestly, enlightened.
I did decide to include a little on how it seems like I have
left the church but I cannot leave it alone. I have to agree, my journey out of
the church has taken much longer than I wanted or expected. It has been over
two years now and it has continued to be difficult for me. I find it interesting
that other than a couple close friends, and a Fathers Day root beer, absolutely
no one from my ward in Airdrie has reached out to me. People continue to be
friendly if I run into them, but that’s about the extent. Yet, several of my
children have had messages left for them. One of which was overstepping quite a
bit. The pot sometimes calls the kettle black. I’m guilty of it as well, I’m
sure, and I again apologize if that’s the case.
I see the last two years as an account of grief, loss, and
honestly trauma. Not that the church has traumatized me per se, my time in the
church was easier and more positive than many that leave. Yet, I do feel
traumatized by certain losses and realizations. I feel negatively effected by
teachings that have been ingrained in me that I am still trying to unlearn in
order to move forward with my life.
I have come to learn that everyone that leaves the church
processes this journey differently. At the death of a loved one, some grieve
for weeks, some years. Some move past the difficult feelings relatively easily
and quickly while others feel the pain for a very long time. Some seek support
while others keep to themselves. Some are open and need to talk through their
pain and others remain quiet. There is no cookie cutter way to grieve. There
isn’t one right or correct way.
I am in a much better place than I was when I was a
believing and attending member of the church. I see leaving as a gift I gave
myself and my kids as we now have the singular opportunity to decide for ourselves
what we will believe. I get to decide the path that my life will take, which
from my perspective will be closer to objective truth. I have begun to find new
meaning and purpose that is more powerful than I had within the church.
I continue to find it disheartening that the church, through
its flagship magazine The Ensign continues to villainize me. "If you are
struggling with questions or doubts about the Church or your faith, you won’t
find truth by reading blogs or listening to podcasts from those who disagree
with the Church or have left it." Except that anyone reading my blog has
found truth. There were those that didn’t know Joseph Smith used a seer stone
in a hat to translate the Book of Mormon. That was truth, admitted by the
church (after having the stone in its possession since Brigham Young, yet not
sharing this information openly for decades). If you didn’t know that before
you read it here, you found truth by reading my blog. I shared that the Book of
Abraham was an incorrect translation of the scrolls Joseph Smith found. If you
did not know that before reading it here, I shared the truth. Whether you
believe there were missing scrolls or not, we have the three facsimiles, and
they were all incorrectly translated. If you didn’t know that before, I told
you that. You learned truth from my blog.
I find it difficult
when the church tells its members to actively avoid information, telling them
to not trust blogs or podcasts from those that disagree or have left the
church. This quote by Hugh B. Brown, who was an apostle for 8 years, then a
member of the First Presidency for nine years, explains my feelings perfectly: "The
honest investigator must be prepared to follow wherever the search for truth
may lead. Truth is often found in the most unexpected places. He must, with
fearless and open mind, insist that facts are far more important than any
cherished, mistaken beliefs, no matter how unpleasant the facts or how
delightful the beliefs." As I stated in my fourth blog, information can
only be deemed Anti-Mormon if it is false. If the church has nothing to hide,
any information out there should not be so disconcerting that members have to
be told to actively avoid it.
In this article I’ve also decided to try to explain why I’ve
been open about my faith shift. The church taught me to value truth and to share
it to those that did not have it, especially if I believed it would make their
lives better. I served a mission for the church for two years of my life doing
what I believed at the time was this exact thing. If sharing the truth is so
important to the church that it sent me thousands of miles away to convince
people that their beliefs were not correct and that I had the right way, I hope
you can understand why I have been open about what I believe is the truth.
The analogy that keeps coming to my mind in trying to
explain why I have been open with my disbelief is one of investing for
retirement. Let’s say you wanted to invest your money in a stock in order to
save for when you were ready to retire. For your entire life, your family and
most of your closest friends have been investing in the same stock. They are
adamant that this stock will give you the best return on your investment. If
you put all your excess money into this stock, they promise that you will be
rich when you retire. They tell you that they have researched all there is to
research about it and this is the best option. They have had experiences that
tell them that this is the right way to invest.
However, I approach you and tell you that I have looked
deeply into this stock and discovered that I strongly believe that you will not
get the promised return. I tell you that over months and years of research, I
have discovered that when you retire, you will not be rich. Rather, you will
have lost your money and will have wasted the opportunity to invest in
different stocks that would have been much more beneficial. Faced with this
situation, would you choose to research the stock for yourself? Would you limit
yourself to information that was given to you by the managers of this stock, or
would you research every single other source of information due to the
extremely high stakes? Would you only listen to the managers of that stock,
considering their obvious bias? Would you blindly listen to me and pull all of
your money out of this stock without first looking deeper for yourself? I
honestly hope not! I would hope that if I were the investor and you had
information that I didn’t, that you would tell me, even if it would be
difficult to convince me.
When I tell you this information you say, “I’ve spent so
much time, energy, and money on this stock. I’m going to lose so much if I walk
away from it.” Yes, yes you are. It’s going to hurt, put you back for a while,
and be hard to come back from. In the end though, it’s worth it. The only logical
way forward for the investor would be to research all available information on
this stock. Look up information from professional investors, explore the stocks
competitors, and get advice from a financial advisor. That is the only way to
determine for yourself the correct course of action to take. I’ve never said to
take my word for anything, I’ve only ever said to research it for yourself.
I should also include here that some people may choose to
continue to invest in this stock because it gives them comfort, even if the
return may be less than expected. If the pain of making a change is greater
than the pain of continuing to invest, perhaps it is best for certain people to
continue rather than going through the difficult road of change. This is also a
valid option as long as people have done the research and made a fully informed
decision (this could also be read as having a nuanced faith).
I have recently been made aware that I have a rescuing persona.
I suppose that I come by this naturally considering I am a Psychologist. It
would appear that I have been trying to rescue my loved ones from something
that I believe is false, whether they wanted rescuing or not. I’ve tried to
share what I believe is the truth. Except when it comes to my loved ones, this
isn’t my job. You are all adults, with minds and wills of your own. I need to respect
that. I haven’t given that fact as much respect as perhaps I should have. For
that, I apologize.
The fact is, the church works for certain people. Those
people can be very happy within it. I personally know people whose lives I
believe would be worse without having belief in the church. However, the church
does not work for everyone. Not everyone feels joy, acceptance, meaning, or
purpose in being a part of it. For those that it no longer works for, or for
those that it doesn’t work for in the first place, that needs to be respected.
More than respected even, when someone tells you that the church does not work
for them it needs to be believed. I wish and hope that in the future the church
focuses less on exclusive truth and more on trying to work for and be inclusive
of a broader range of people. Yet my wishes and hopes about the church don’t
need to drive me anymore.
As I was writing this post, I came to a realization. Call it
an epiphany, a moment of clarity, a light-bulb moment, or the Holy Ghost; whatever
you call it, it felt meaningful to me. I realized that I don’t need
understanding anymore. I don’t need to care about being judged. I don’t need to
rescue anyone from what I believe is false. It’s not my job. I’ve done what I
needed to in order to move forward and I don’t regret any of that in the
slightest. Now it’s everyone else’s job to figure it out from here.
I also came to realize that I don’t need to expect any certain
behavior from anyone else. In the church we are told that if you do something
good, you will get a blessing. When you receive any good thing in your life, it
was because you were obedient to some higher law upon which that blessing was
predicated. God is bound and must bless us when we do as He says, so we learn
to expect blessings in repayment for doing good things. I have realized that I
don’t need to live my life waiting for the universe to give back to me equally
for what I give. I don’t have to focus on some cosmic sense of balance in order
to decide what behaviors from others I expect as a response to things I say or
do. I can be what I want others to be without any expectation of getting
anything in return. I can model behaviour that I wish others to engage in,
regardless of whether they ever behave this way towards me or not. I can check
in on others to make sure they are okay without having an expectation that they
or anyone else does the same for me or my family. I can give of my time and
energy even if it is not given back. To summarize it all up in a nice package,
complete with bow on top, I can choose to give to the world and humanity more
than I get back.
This can be one way I find new meaning in my life. New
purpose. I choose to be a good husband, not because of what I will get out of
it but because I value being a faithful, kind, dedicated spouse. I can be a
good father not because of what I get from my children but because I value
raising good people, that are better than I am, and that are secure in the
knowledge that they are loved. I can choose to be a good friend, not because it
is an exercise that is perfectly balanced in how often I initiate contact vs.
how often they do, but because I value the interactions we do have. I can be a
welcoming and supportive son/son-in-law and brother/brother-in-law because
that’s what aligns with my values, not because I need anything in return. I can
be a good Samaritan to those around me because it is the right thing to do, not
because I believe I will be repaid by Karma or some higher power. I can offer
complete acceptance and inclusion, regardless of race or sexual orientation,
without hesitation and without limit. I can be the change that I want to see in
the world, not because it will make some huge impact, but because it might, at
least to some.
In explaining my feelings during lunch yesterday, my friend
said this sounded like a spiritual awakening. They suggested that it’s likely I
needed to leave the church so as to continue my path towards becoming a better
person. They also reminded me that it’s also possible for people to remain a
part of the church and have a similar spiritual awakening, or to continue to
progress towards becoming more enlightened themselves. I completely agree. I do
believe that members of the church need to know all available information in
order to make informed decisions before they can continue progressing though. I
believe the church can give a basic foundation for building spirituality and
growth but that in order to continue forward (think Fowler’s Stages of Faith
Development from the intro to the Believer post), members must move beyond the milk
that is taught in the manuals and search for the meat themselves. However, for
certain people, remaining a part of the church is the right decision for them.
As for the role the Mormon church will play in my life
moving forward, I’m not exactly sure. I think the healthiest direction would be
to continue moving away from my association with it. The more I think about it,
the stronger I believe that those that don’t fit the mold are not fully welcome
in the church. I don’t believe that any effort I may make to build bridges of
understanding would be seen as anything but confrontation. Some may disagree,
but it’s how I feel. That doesn’t mean that I’ll never step foot in an LDS
church again. After Covid has been figured out, one way or another, I’m sure I
will attend at times. I would like to attend missionary farewells. I will be
present for weddings, even if it will have to be from outside during certain
parts. I might try to attend regular Sunday services at times to see if my
hypothesis about my place in the church is correct or not. I know that I can
have respectful conversations with those of faith about the things they find
important while sharing my perspective in a non-threatening, non-judgmental
way. I’ve done it before. There are at least some that are close to me that
would agree. I realize that I likely have come across as confrontational in the
past and for that I apologize.
I suppose this entire post, probably the entirety of my blog
as well, could be seen as one epic YAGE (for those that don’t know, that’s Yet
Another Grand Exit). It probably was, lol! Except that I needed it. It served a
purpose to me. Just like those that post about Light the World, Easter, or
Ramadan, everyone has the right to openly post to social media anything that is
important to them. This was important to me. I say was because it’s not
important to me anymore. It’s been almost a year since I posted my last
personal article, my final thoughts. I suppose if anyone else makes me aware of
any other mistakes or untruths in my blog I will publicly acknowledge, change,
and apologize for them. Beyond that though, I’m moving forward. The world
outside the church is a big one and life is a long time. I had better start
living for my present and future rather than looking back at the past.