Part 1
To start, it’s important to understand that
I was a believer. I believed enough to go to seminary every morning, to read
the Book of Mormon almost daily, I served a mission and married in the temple.
I did all of the things I was supposed to do because I believed.
As I experienced it, there are two
requirements of Mormonism that supersede all else. The first was the pressure
to be pure. To Choose the Right is to have the Spirit. To fall short is to be
sad, to lose the comforting influence of the Holy Ghost, and to maybe have an
embarrassing conversation about sex with whichever plumber or accountant was
currently called by God to ask people in your ward who they had touched and
where.
The second great requirement of Mormonism
was to have a testimony. To KNOW that this church was right and all the others
wrong. You might not know yet, but older people in your ward did, and one day
you would have to as well.
In the end, failure on either of these two
requirements could result in separation from your family. Mormonism doesn’t
really have a hell, at least not a very traditional one. It has lesser
kingdoms, which are still beautiful, but where you aren’t with your family.
Families CAN be together forever. Teach me ALL THAT I MUST DO to live with him
someday. Nearly every song and lesson carries the implicit warning that you
might not make it, or even that your future wife and kids might be given to
another because you couldn’t cut it. Or if you make it you’ll be there without
your more rebellious family members.
I believed enough to have the occasional
panic attack at the thought of the Second Coming, believing I possibly wasn’t good
enough to make it. I believed enough that when cracks formed in my belief of
the Book of Mormon, it affected my health. I was a full-time missionary and
zone leader, as fully invested in the church as I could possibly be, separated
from friends and family. I knew the Book of Mormon intimately, and had read
many times a particular passage where Nephi laments “O wretched man that I am”.
Nephi, we are to believe, lived in the 6th century BC. Because
missionaries are taught to preference the Book of Mormon over the Bible, I had
only a superficial understanding of the Bible. But when I finally got around to
digging in to the New Testament, there was Paul proclaiming “O wretched man
that I am”. That phrase made everything grind to a halt. Nephi had sailed to
the New World around 600 BC. Why was Nephi quoting a man who wouldn’t live for
hundreds of years? It didn’t stop there, I found the Book of Mormon full of
direct quotes from the New Testament, a book ostensibly written hundreds of
years after Nephi. The thought of it
being written by Joseph Smith, and not translated from plates, was a terrifying
proposition.
I read Lectures on Faith, where the
brethren are taught that there are two members of the Godhead, God and Jesus,
Jesus with a physical body, God a spirit. This was written several years before
Joseph’s proclamation that there are three members of the Godhead, and that God
is a man, with a body of flesh and bones. Joseph had said that knowing the true
nature of God was essential to worshiping him, why did the early church keep
changing the true nature of God?
Cracks started to form, but to tell anyone
felt like blasphemy. To be half a continent from my family, committed to
completing an honorable full-time mission, this kind of realization was
devastating. I lost weight and sleep as I limped through the final months of my
mission. It’s hard to overstate the physical, mental, and spiritual toll a
faith crisis has on a missionary.
I enrolled in University, adding as many
archaeology classes into my schedule as I could manage, devouring FARMS reviews
(now the Maxwell Institute, at the time dedicated to archaeological and
academic work trying to support the veracity of the Book of Mormon). But the
more I studied the Book of Mormon, the more I saw the world of Joseph Smith in
it, and the less I could justify it as an ancient record. The language, the
technology, the agriculture, everything about it pointed to religion and
culture of 1800’s New England. I wanted more than anything to believe that it
had come from ancient American prophets, but on one issue after another
Mormonism seemed to fit a 19th century context, not an ancient one.
I had devoted my life to the church, and my
inability to mentally make the Book of Mormon work as an ancient text shattered
my worldview and my security. What was worse, I discovered that I was far from
the first to have this realization. BH Roberts had written an internal report
in the early 20th century detailing the similarities between the
Book of Mormon and other books available to Joseph Smith. Other books predating
the Book of Mormon had speculated about branches of Israel sailing to the
Americas, building cities and splitting into wicked and righteous factions.
In archaeology I learned that pre-Columbian
Americans had grown crops like corn, beans squash, wild rice, they had relied
on animals like bison in the north, llamas in the south. There was no wheat, no
cows or pigs or horses. This was all known long before I had been sent to
seminary and institute to bolster my belief that the Book of Mormon was
translated from ancient plates.
No one had ever brought up the serious
doubts about the origins on the Book of Mormon, it was a trap I had to fall
into alone, miles from home, and afraid to mention to anyone my suspicions.
It’s hard to overstate the mental anguish many church members suffer when their
belief is shattered. I’m sympathetic to the believers who would be hurt by
going through the same process I did, but it’s crucial that we stop setting the
next generation of kids up for their own painful realizations.
The church at the highest levels seemed to
have questions about the historicity of the Book of Mormon, why did they let me
leave home without telling me? How can we continue to send kids out without
telling them? The missionary program is recognizing how prevalent mental health
issues are among missionaries, they’re allowing more exercise, and more calls home,
but without honesty about our founders and founding documents they face an
impossible uphill battle.
Every member faces the prospect of a
difficult and deeply painful reckoning with the difficult history of the
church, the path with the least damage and pain is to do it at an institutional
level, where we can guide each other through as a community.
The pathway to spirituality in the church
runs right through several “checkpoints” of authority. You get a good feeling,
find out the Book of Mormon is true, which tells you Joseph Smith is a prophet,
which tells you the brethren are God’s chosen mouthpieces, and you are part of
the only true church. What happens when you come to question the Book of
Mormon? Or Joseph Smith? Your pathway to spiritual wellness is shattered, you
might become a pariah in a culture that subscribes to the one true path. You
lose faith in any one of those checkpoints and you’re in danger of losing your
entire tribe.
When you lose belief, you quickly learn
that testimony, your belief in the foundational mythology, and in the top
leadership as literal prophets, is at the core of participation in Mormonism.
To speak in church presupposes this belief, speakers are expected to affirm
belief and bear testimony. Teachers are expected to affirm literal belief and
bear testimony. Status and attendance at church schools has traditionally
required belief. To lose one’s testimony can threaten one’s academic career.
Temple attendance requires a belief in the foundational claims, and in the leaders
as prophets, seers and revelators. This means attending family weddings is
often only available to those who believe. We are literally separating families
based on things as intimate as thoughts and beliefs.
Even church discipline presupposes belief.
In a “court of love”, the defendant is expected to work their way back into
good standing. The process in most cases intends for the disciplined individual
to rectify their behavior, and in humility seek reinstatement. This humility
hinges on a belief in Priesthood authority. Absent testimony the process is
little more than an expulsion.
When callings, ceremonies, talks, weddings,
university degrees, in many cases social acceptance, are dependent on
testimony, to lose testimony is an instant demotion to second class status.
As long as testimony is the central litmus
of worthiness, loss of belief is catastrophic.
What if we just focused on finding moments
of peace, or inspiration however we can find them? If the Book of Mormon helps
you have that experience, great! If you don’t connect with the Book of Mormon?
Who cares! You can still search inside the community. The choir inspires you
and the General Conference talks don’t? You’re on equal footing with everyone
else in the pews. You’re not overlooked for callings because you can’t proclaim
with certainty that Joseph Smith was a prophet. You’re worthy to serve just
because you’re willing and you show up.
Moments of peace, of inspiration,
camaraderie, and growth are at the core of the religious experience. Scripture,
prayer, music, the people in pastoral roles are tools to help you get there.
Lose belief in the Book of Abraham? It’s a speedbump and not a wall.
I’ll reiterate that the membership is full
of wonderful people, there are winds of change at all levels. I don’t see the
leadership as uncaring, there is slow creaking change. But testimony can’t be a
prerequisite for full standing and participation in the church. Currently it
still is and we’re losing many of our best and brightest because of it.
As difficult as the process was for me,
there is so much benefit to membership in the church community I would like to
see something healthier emerge. Pushing questionable foundation mythology hurts
people. I don’t feel the same way about youth programs, dances, home teaching,
family home evening, casseroles, the Relief Society, funeral potatoes, and a
long list of aspects of the church that I think are great. In part two I hope
to offer a vision of what I would like to see.
Can’t imagine losing a testimony as a missionary, but I sure wish it would have happened then instead of 45 years in with my case.
ReplyDelete"We are literally separating families based on things as intimate as thoughts and beliefs." THIS IS THE PART THAT IS SO DISHEARTENING.
ReplyDelete...the Book of Mormon is the keystone of [our] testimony. Just as the arch crumbles if the keystone is removed, so does all the Church stand or fall with the truthfulness of the Book of Mormon.
ReplyDelete— PRESIDENT EZRA T. BENSON, THE BOOK OF MORMON - KEYSTONE OF OUR RELIGION
Either the Book of Mormon is what the Prophet Joseph said it is or this Church and its founder are false, fraudulent, a deception from the first instance onward.
— PRESIDENT JEFFREY R. HOLLAND, TRUE OF FALSE, NEW ERA, JUNE 1995
“Our whole strength rests on the validity of that [first] vision. It either occurred or it did not occur. If it did not, then this work is a fraud. If it did, then it is the most important and wonderful work under the heavens.”
—President Gordon B. Hinckley
“Each of us has to face the matter — either the Church is true, or it is a fraud. There is no middle ground. It is the church and kingdom of God, or it is nothing.”
—President Gordon B. Hinckley
“Well, it’s either true or false. If it’s false, we’re engaged in a great fraud. If it’s true, it’s the most important thing in the world.”
—President Gordon B. Hinckley
“If the origin of the Book of Mormon could be proved to be other than that set forth by Joseph Smith; if the book itself could be proved to be other than it claims to be...then the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, and its message and doctrines...must fall;”
—B.H. Roberts, New Witness for God